Showing posts with label CPSO. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPSO. Show all posts

Monday, March 25, 2019

No right to 'play God'

Woman sues Toronto doctors for allegedly ignoring father's wishes to stay alive
Doctors accused of negligence or malpractice in the death of Second World War vet

Monday, February 01, 2016

When patient advocates are better than doctors



Maybe.
Probably not.
We have regulating bodies like the C.P.S.O. looking after us!


Last, but not least, in Ontario we have the
Ontario Hospital Association

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Kingston woman upset by oversight body's findings into incomplete appendectomy - Ottawa - CBC News


Christine Sulek-Popov had to undergo two appendix removal surgeries after her first surgeon inadvertently left 5 cm of her appendix in her body. (Ashley Burke/CBC)

Confirmation that the College knows best‽

Monday, October 06, 2014

Dangers of pharmacists' alert fatigue.

When I saw this article, it isn't just a pharmacist trouble area but that of doctors as well.

As one's age becomes more "golden" the number of medications on the shelf seems to increase at an alarming rate. This make one wonder if there there are adverse drug interactions that we should pro-actively investigate on our own!

Jan 19, 2015


Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Patient safety and protection?

Is it a reality here in Canada or a fiction?

Click here to see an article on medical whistle blowers that may make you wonder.

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Robbie’s Law

Robbie’s Law to give families the right to get the truth about medical negligence

THE family of a Welsh schoolboy who died as a result of medical negligence has been credited with inspiring the UK Government to introduce a duty on healthcare providers to be honest with patients and their families when things go wrong.Patients’ rights campaigners said the so-called Duty of Candour should be known as “Robbie’s Law” in honour of 10-year-old Robbie Powell who was killed in 1990 by a treatable condition that doctors missed.The UK Government this week committed itself to the legal duty in its response to the NHS Future Forum report which sets out how the health service in England will be modernised in the future.

BRICK by BRICK
Maybe, just maybe, justice?
In the distant future?







Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Pathologist stripped of his medical licence

A perfect, sad, example of the effectiveness of the current system of self regulation that serves the medical profession?

A regulatory body that consistently looked the other way?



Monday, July 19, 2010

see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil

Oh, isn't it remarkable at how confident we can be with the effectiveness of the self regulation that the medical profession has achieved world wide?


Sunday, May 09, 2010

Patient group aims to lift veil on medical errors

Each year, medical errors kill almost 24,000 Canadians, yet many patients say they struggle getting hospital staff to admit the mistakes. That why they've formed a new group calling for that to change.

Monday, March 01, 2010

Panel to probe Windsor hospitals

I don't find any comfort in this exercise!
I remember the expressions
Self regulation
Self serving

Are Windsor Hospitals really a perceived aberration, in that they perform less properly than other hospitals in other centers?


Saturday, August 01, 2009

A 'comedy of errors'

"....the family's concerns were properly addressed by the patient relations office."

Things haven't changed much?


"One wrong (medication) could kill her. I know that she's complicated but on top of her dying, I shouldn't be afraid of them doing something to her."

Paranoid?


Nurses Association director
'saddened'
by story

August 6, 2009


Wikipedia


Monday, April 27, 2009

Ontario is prepared for Swine Flu Threat ! ?


The World Health Organisation has confirmed
that swine flu continues to spread
at a pace of 1000 new infections per day.
Friday, May 22, 2009




I wonder if these perceived threats are helpful?


If an individual misinterprets information, and this will have serious life threatening implications on that individual's health and life, wouldn't an ethical health provider at least make an attempt to ensure that the cause for the misinterpretation was effectively explained?

Is it ethical to repeatedly aggravate, instead of minimizing, the concern?

Is it reasonable to assume that, without an attempt to clear up the cause for the "misinterpretation", there effectively is not any misinterpretation?

The following letters may provide some clarification.

November 9, 2001, letter, Attention: Hospital Chief Executive Office

and

April 14, 2003, letter Attention: The Honourable Tony Clement
Minister of Health (Ontario)




Epidemic and Pandemic Alert
and Response (EPR)




Related Posts with Thumbnails