Is it a reality here in Canada or a fiction?
Click here to see an article on medical whistle blowers that may make you wonder.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
...
...
....
Patient's rights to their medical records. A fiction in reality? Patients have rights? For evil to prevail – it is sufficient only – that good men/women do nothing? The appearance of a link or the contents of comments, on any page, in no way indicates or implies an endorsement of any kind. Viewers are asked to advise of the presence of inappropriate comments or postings. Click on a comment link to express your view on a post. Alert a friend, to a post, by clicking on its envelope icon.
My Blog List
-
-
-
Q&A with Dr. Christine Soong1 month ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
RAIN!!!!!7 years ago
-
DAY 39599 years ago
-
-
-
-
Jenin, Jenin, Jenin15 years ago
-
-
-
-
FeedJit
Followers
Links
- Canadian Federation of Catholic Physicians' Societies
- Catholic Medical Quarterly
- Patients for Patient Safety Canada
- Falsify Records
- Surviving Hospitals
- Patient Advocates
- Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA)
- Crazy Canucks
- Online Health Services Schools
- CAF Medical Files
- Medical Neglect excarex
- Canadian Virtual Hospice
- The Life Guardian
- Medical News Today
- Other 6
- Open Medicine
- Injustice Busters
- The Shipman Inquiry
- The White Coat
- Cybertip.ca Information
- Health Treatment Concerns
- The Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario
- How do you diagnose death?
SELF REGULATING? - SELF SERVING?
IF THE PERCEIVED DISTINCTION IS NOT CLEAR,
CAN IT BE JUST?
Déjà vu?
"An evil exists that threatens every man, woman and child of this great nation."
-Adolph Hitler
Apropos Quote?
IF THE PERCEIVED DISTINCTION IS NOT CLEAR,
CAN IT BE JUST?
Déjà vu?
"An evil exists that threatens every man, woman and child of this great nation."
-Adolph Hitler
Apropos Quote?
1 comment:
I find it very troubling when the national TV service starts advocating for what's right and just. First, I know that the thing most important to someone in journalism is to come up with an idea for a show. They sit down and chew on all sorts of ideas and eventually come up with one on an edgy topic that "says" and "doesn't say" at the same time. There is also the manipulation in there of pretending that the government is "on it..." when it comes to health care crime. The proof to me is that each of these whistle blowers talks in a very foggy way about their observations. We never see anyone actually get to the nitty-gritty. It's always something very general, something policy related and out of the ordinary person's experience. They always give examples of patients who are going to die soon so that the public response, "well they were sick anyway and we can't all live forever," or "well there isn't enough money to save people with cancer" sounds so wise.
The whistle-blowers who we get to see are specially chosen by Dr Goldman to appear. There are many others who do not appear because the CBC also thinks they are insane.
I want to see a whistle-blower allowed on the show who says that people are being purposely killed in hospitals for their organs or to cover up for earlier malpractice. I don't see Dr Goldman doing that on his show. If he did, HE would be called "insane" like the doctors he features. It's all such crap propaganda!
People who comment that "it's good the CBC is airing this topic" are really, really out of it.
Post a Comment