Friday, March 21, 2008

the charles smith blog

"An Extraordinary Development in Canada:
Three Inquiries Based on Flawed Pathology In One Country At The Same Time;
Crisis?"

Not really an extraordinary development.
Pathology standards, as well as all other medical standards,
appear to have been consistent for years.

Is this another example?


Tuesday, March 18, 2008

CPSI launches first-ever Canadian Disclosure Guidelines

Guidelines aim to cut medical errors


Another view?


Not right to remain silent about errors, medical guidelines say



This would be an extraordinary, dramatic change from the apparent current practice of cover up with detailed all encompassing meaningless explanations. One can expect the word "appropriate" to be used liberally in a "double entendre" fashion, in an attempt to confound the gullible. Here's an example!?

Related Posts with Thumbnails