Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Saturday, May 03, 2008
Pathology errors spark concern over hospital laboratories
Is this a crisis!?‽
Maybe the accepted "Standard of Practice" that has evolved from "Self Regulation" is a contributing factor to the crisis‽
SELF REGULATING? - SELF SERVING?
Samson and Goliath,
Who will be the winner?
Maybe the accepted "Standard of Practice" that has evolved from "Self Regulation" is a contributing factor to the crisis‽
SELF REGULATING? - SELF SERVING?
Samson and Goliath,
Who will be the winner?
Monday, March 24, 2008
Brain death diagnosis
An organ harvest was begun, that was until he moved his arm.
Man Makes “Miraculous” Recovery from Brain Death
When brain death isn't terminal
The case of a revived 'brain-dead' accident victim raises some disturbing issues
Apr 13, 2008
Brain Death is the irreversible cessation of all brain function including that of the brain stem.
There is no possibility of recovery in this situation and once brain death has been confirmed,
the patient is legally dead.
Reassuring?
Legally dead?
Actually dead?
Medically dead?
Maybe dead?
Haleigh Poutre speaks
DECLARED BRAIN DEAD
PARENTS REFUSED TO EUTHANIZE
WOKE UP FROM COMA
The case of a revived 'brain-dead' accident victim raises some disturbing issues
Apr 13, 2008
Brain Death is the irreversible cessation of all brain function including that of the brain stem.
There is no possibility of recovery in this situation and once brain death has been confirmed,
the patient is legally dead.
Reassuring?
Legally dead?
Actually dead?
Medically dead?
Maybe dead?
Haleigh Poutre speaks
DECLARED BRAIN DEAD
PARENTS REFUSED TO EUTHANIZE
WOKE UP FROM COMA
Friday, March 21, 2008
the charles smith blog
"An Extraordinary Development in Canada:
Three Inquiries Based on Flawed Pathology In One Country At The Same Time;
Crisis?"
Three Inquiries Based on Flawed Pathology In One Country At The Same Time;
Crisis?"
Not really an extraordinary development.
Pathology standards, as well as all other medical standards,
appear to have been consistent for years.
Is this another example?
Pathology standards, as well as all other medical standards,
appear to have been consistent for years.
Is this another example?
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
CPSI launches first-ever Canadian Disclosure Guidelines
Guidelines aim to cut medical errors
Another view?
Not right to remain silent about errors, medical guidelines say
This would be an extraordinary, dramatic change from the apparent current practice of cover up with detailed all encompassing meaningless explanations. One can expect the word "appropriate" to be used liberally in a "double entendre" fashion, in an attempt to confound the gullible. Here's an example!?
Saturday, March 01, 2008
MD 'secrets' will go public
Malpractice judgments will be posted on College's website, thanks to Star probe
Ethics Honesty
As understood by the public!?
As understood by the
Health Professions Colleges!?
Self Regulation!!!!!!!
W-FIVE: Right to Know
Streaming video of the program on this link
Updated Fri. Feb. 29 2008 11:13 AM ET
:¬ (
As understood by the public!?
As understood by the
Health Professions Colleges!?
Self Regulation!!!!!!!
W-FIVE Investigates the Secretive World of Medicine and the Toronto Doctor Dozens of Women Claim Injured Them
W-FIVE: Right to Know
Streaming video of the program on this link
Updated Fri. Feb. 29 2008 11:13 AM ET
:¬ (
Patient fired by her doctor
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Equal Justice For All?
Premier's fan accused of death threats
And is the following an example of consistency in the application of justice?
If an organization repeatedly reiterates what they know will be interpreted as a threat, then is it not logical to assume that they have knowingly given the threat? Isn't a threat to cause harm or death a criminal offence in most of Canada?
Maybe the perceived difference is due to the fact that the second example deals with the exemplary ethical, self regulating, law respecting honest medical profession?
Probably so!
The Current Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario is clearly an investigation, of a possible aberration, of the profession's ethics?
Maybe the "Shipman Inquiry", in another jurisdiction, is another example?
And is the following an example of consistency in the application of justice?
If an organization repeatedly reiterates what they know will be interpreted as a threat, then is it not logical to assume that they have knowingly given the threat? Isn't a threat to cause harm or death a criminal offence in most of Canada?
Maybe the perceived difference is due to the fact that the second example deals with the exemplary ethical, self regulating, law respecting honest medical profession?
Probably so!
The Current Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario is clearly an investigation, of a possible aberration, of the profession's ethics?
Maybe the "Shipman Inquiry", in another jurisdiction, is another example?
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Doctors 'must own up to blunders'
"A new culture of honesty and openness should see such patients receive a personal apology from the doctor concerned and a detailed explanation of what went wrong"
One wonders when signs of this "NEW CULTURE" will become evident!
A new culture‽
A continuing culture‽
A new culture‽
A continuing culture‽
Monday, December 17, 2007
Sick Kids staff shocked over pathologist's work habits
"A secretary who worked alongside Dr. Charles Smith for years says she found a bag of dried human tissue, a dish containing bones and a child's hospital bracelet during one of her frequent searches of the pathologist's ramshackle office."
Hospital 'fines' for patient harm
"The taxpayer should not have to foot the bill for poor care that resulted in longer stays in hospital"
Maybe the idea is catching!
See Aug 19, 2007 post
See Aug 19, 2007 post
The new policy raises the possibility of changes in medical practice
as doctors hew more closely to clinical guidelines.
The hospital where octuplets were born in January
has been fined for a second time
for failing to protect the family's medical privacy.
17 July 2009
as doctors hew more closely to clinical guidelines.
The hospital where octuplets were born in January
has been fined for a second time
for failing to protect the family's medical privacy.
17 July 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)